Opened 14 years ago

Closed 12 years ago

Last modified 10 years ago

#3167 closed task (fixed)

ruby-1.9.2

Reported by: ken@… Owned by: Randy McMurchy
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: BOOK Version: SVN
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc:

Description

While I was testing the book's version of ruby-1.9.1-p376 for openssl-1.0.0a I hit a build failure. Updating to the last 1.9.1 patchlevel failed to fix it. It's in the ssl code, but to me it looks like a gcc or glibc issue.

compiling openssl
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ken/ruby-1.9.1-p430/ext/openssl'
gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-linux -I../.././include -I../.././ext/openssl -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\"extconf.h\"    -fPIC  -O2 -g -Wall -Wno-parentheses  -fPIC  -o ossl.o -c ossl.c
ossl.c:118:1: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘*’ token
ossl.c:119:1: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘*’ token
make[1]: *** [ossl.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ken/ruby-1.9.1-p430/ext/openssl'
make: *** [mkmain.sh] Error 1

Fortunately, 1.9.2 builds without issue (patchlevel 0). I note that 'make test' is now a minimal build (1 minute 12 on this system), 'make check' is currently running and taking a much longer time - now finished, 7m40, 7665 tests, 2174195 assertions, 2 failures, 1 errors, 0 skips

YMMV (I have berkeley db but not tk on this system).

Change History (4)

comment:1 by Randy McMurchy, 13 years ago

Milestone: future6.7

Updated milestone to 6.7

comment:2 by Randy McMurchy, 13 years ago

Owner: changed from blfs-book@… to Randy McMurchy
Status: newassigned

Since I'm going to update Subversion and the dang Ruby bindings are part of the package, I'll take this one one. Why oh why can't the developers split their bindings into separate packages.

Perhaps that would make life too easy.

comment:3 by bdubbs@…, 12 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

comment:4 by bdubbs@…, 10 years ago

Milestone: 6.7

Milestone 6.7 deleted

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.