Changeset b2a9f85 for appendices/symlinks

Timestamp:

09/21/2003 02:07:57 PM (21 years ago)

Author:

Larry Lawrence <larry@…>

Branches:

10.0, 10.1, 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.2.0, 6.2.0-rc1, 6.2.0-rc2, 6.3, 6.3-rc1, 6.3-rc2, 6.3-rc3, 7.10, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.6-blfs, 7.6-systemd, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, basic, bdubbs/svn, elogind, gimp3, gnome, kde5-13430, kde5-14269, kde5-14686, kea, ken/TL2024, ken/inkscape-core-mods, ken/tuningfonts, krejzi/svn, lazarus, lxqt, nosym, perl-modules, plabs/newcss, plabs/python-mods, python3.11, qt5new, rahul/power-profiles-daemon, renodr/vulkan-addition, systemd-11177, systemd-13485, trunk, upgradedb, v5_0, v5_0-pre1, v5_1, v5_1-pre1, xry111/for-12.3, xry111/intltool, xry111/llvm18, xry111/soup3, xry111/spidermonkey128, xry111/test-20220226, xry111/xf86-video-removal

Children:

c4f1401

Parents:

36f9a23

Message:

acronym tagging

git-svn-id: svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/BLFS/trunk/BOOK@1145 af4574ff-66df-0310-9fd7-8a98e5e911e0

File:

• appendices/symlinks/symlinks.xml (modified) (1 diff)

appendices/symlinks/symlinks.xml

@@ -1 +1 @@
 <appendix role="dsssl" id="appendices-symlinks">
 <?dbhtml filename="symlinks.html" dir="appendices"?>
-<title>List of rc?.d symlinks used in LFS/BLFS</title>
+<title>List of rc?.d symlinks used in <acronym>LFS</acronym>/<acronym>BLFS</acronym></title>
 
 <para>This section lists all of the symlinks used by the lfs-bootscripts
 package (correct as of version <userinput>1.9</userinput>) and all of
-the scripts in the BLFS book.  This is for two reasons:  first, so that
-you can see at a glance which number we have used for each package, and
-second so that <emphasis>we</emphasis> can see which number we have
-used for each package!  Without this, it would make our lives more
+the scripts in the <acronym>BLFS</acronym> book.  This is for two reasons:  
+first, so that you can see at a glance which number we have used for each 
+package, and second so that <emphasis>we</emphasis> can see which number we 
+have used for each package!  Without this, it would make our lives more
 difficult (as we'd probably end up with conflicts).</para>