| 1 | | My initial goal was not limited to Editor's notes... As an example, even the first page https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/BlfsNotes needs reviewing: some links are obsolete; the chapters are not in sync with the book, etc. |
| | 1 | My initial goal was not limited to Editor's notes... As an example, even the first page https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/BlfsNotes needs reviewing: some links are obsolete; the chapters are not in sync with the book, etc. And when you descend into chapters, several links either don't exist or exist and give an empty page. Another example: the GNOME chapter is divided into "core packages" and "additional packages", and the first core package is "caribou" (the page exists and is empty), which has not been in the book for more than a decade... |
| | 2 | |
| | 3 | I am not sure how to fix this: we should decide on the information we want to include into this wiki, and how to structure it. If we don't want to give access to users, I'd say it should contain very little, because apart from a few packages, we don't have the manpower for maintaining the information up to date. |
