id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	severity	resolution	keywords	cc
5915	xmlto now apparently uses xmltex/pdfxmltex, not PassiveTex	ken@…	blfs-book@…	"Looking at the valgrind issue, I found a note in Arch that xmlto needs pdfxmltex for its docs, and asking if anybody was willing to package that. We have it using dblatex (a straightforward build), PassiveTex, and fop (which is in the book but brings in a load of dependencies).

Running configure, now that I have texlive installed (I normally build xmlto very early on a desktop : chicken meet egg) I can see that it checks for dblatex, xmltex, pdfxmltex (I have both of those, pdfxmltex got into the Makefile) and fop. Looks as if it still needs the other two.

I might build these in my current throwaway build, after I have looked at valgrind, or I might not. So for the moment, this is just a claim that our deps are incorrect. Whether it can actually build the docs if all the deps are presnet remains to be seen."	enhancement	closed	low	7.7	BOOK	SVN	low	invalid