Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#6742 closed enhancement (fixed)
talloc-2.1.3
Reported by: | Fernando de Oliveira | Owned by: | Fernando de Oliveira |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 7.8 |
Component: | BOOK | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
https://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/talloc-2.1.3.tar.gz
https://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/talloc-2.1.3.tar.asc
Only changes found:
http://repo.or.cz/w/Samba.git/commit/e05cb33511da81a2916b7504308552bcb4cbd587
talloc: version 2.1.3 * improved python3 bindings * documentation fixes regarding talloc_reference() and talloc_unlink()
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
I saw that it was only used by Samba. However, it's a pretty low maintenance package (CMMI, no required dependencies) so I'd just recommend leaving it in the book.
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 9 years ago
OK, thanks.
But it is only listed at cifsutils, not samba.
After your reply, I've found in the Samba build log a search for system talloc, but it is not listed there. Think we need to include it there.
I don't know how to test talloc.
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
Just build it and then rebuild cifs-utils. If it links, that's enough testing for us. It's upstream's job to do detailed testing.
comment:7 by , 9 years ago
I discovered that I had already made a script to build/install talloc and cifs-utils-6.4, with a test. Had forgotten that. Now I'm feeling much better, about this ticket. You are not the only one with memory problems. :-)
I was searching how to test these libraries, then only found
using it, as optional dependency.
Question is: how useful is this package for us?