source: chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml@ a094de3

10.0 10.0-rc1 10.1 10.1-rc1 11.0 11.0-rc1 11.0-rc2 11.0-rc3 11.1 11.1-rc1 11.2 11.2-rc1 11.3 11.3-rc1 12.0 12.0-rc1 12.1 12.1-rc1 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.5-systemd 7.6 7.6-systemd 7.7 7.7-systemd 7.8 7.8-systemd 7.9 7.9-systemd 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 9.0 9.1 arm bdubbs/gcc13 ml-11.0 multilib renodr/libudev-from-systemd s6-init trunk xry111/arm64 xry111/arm64-12.0 xry111/clfs-ng xry111/lfs-next xry111/loongarch xry111/loongarch-12.0 xry111/loongarch-12.1 xry111/mips64el xry111/pip3 xry111/rust-wip-20221008 xry111/update-glibc
Last change on this file since a094de3 was a094de3, checked in by Gerard Beekmans <gerard@…>, 15 years ago

Changed TARGET_TRIPLET to LFS_TGT to match the contents of Chapter 4- Setting Up the Environment.

git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@8916 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689

  • Property mode set to 100644
File size: 12.1 KB
Line 
1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
2<!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN"
3 "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd" [
4 <!ENTITY % general-entities SYSTEM "../general.ent">
5 %general-entities;
6]>
7
8<sect1 id="ch-tools-toolchaintechnotes">
9 <?dbhtml filename="toolchaintechnotes.html"?>
10
11 <title>Toolchain Technical Notes</title>
12
13 <para>This section explains some of the rationale and technical details
14 behind the overall build method. It is not essential to immediately
15 understand everything in this section. Most of this information will be
16 clearer after performing an actual build. This section can be referred
17 to at any time during the process.</para>
18
19 <para>The overall goal of <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> is to
20 provide a temporary environment that can be chrooted into and from which can be
21 produced a clean, trouble-free build of the target LFS system in <xref
22 linkend="chapter-building-system"/>. Along the way, we separate the new system
23 from the host system as much as possible, and in doing so, build a
24 self-contained and self-hosted toolchain. It should be noted that the build
25 process has been designed to minimize the risks for new readers and provide
26 maximum educational value at the same time.</para>
27
28 <important>
29 <para>Before continuing, be aware of the name of the working platform,
30 often referred to as the target triplet. A simple way to determine the
31 name of the target triplet is to run the <command>config.guess</command>
32 script that comes with the source for many packages. Unpack the Binutils
33 sources and run the script: <userinput>./config.guess</userinput> and note
34 the output. For example, for a modern 32-bit Intel processor the
35 output will likely be <emphasis>i686-pc-linux-gnu</emphasis>.</para>
36
37 <para>Also be aware of the name of the platform's dynamic linker, often
38 referred to as the dynamic loader (not to be confused with the standard
39 linker <command>ld</command> that is part of Binutils). The dynamic linker
40 provided by Glibc finds and loads the shared libraries needed by a program,
41 prepares the program to run, and then runs it. The name of the dynamic
42 linker for a 32-bit Intel machine will be
43 <filename class="libraryfile">ld-linux.so.2</filename>.
44 A sure-fire way to determine the name of the dynamic linker is to
45 inspect a random binary from the host system by running:
46 <userinput>readelf -l &lt;name of binary&gt; | grep interpreter</userinput>
47 and noting the output. The authoritative reference covering all platforms
48 is in the <filename>shlib-versions</filename> file in the root of the Glibc
49 source tree.</para>
50 </important>
51
52 <para>Some key technical points of how the <xref
53 linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> build method works:</para>
54
55 <itemizedlist>
56 <listitem>
57 <para>Slightly adjusting the name of the working platform ensures that
58 the first build of Binutils and GCC produces a compatible cross-linker
59 and cross-compiler. Instead of producing binaries for another architecture,
60 the cross-linker and cross-compiler will produce binaries compatible with
61 the current hardware.</para>
62 </listitem>
63 <listitem>
64 <para>The temporary libraries are cross-compiled. This removes all
65 dependency on the host system, lessens the chance of headers or libraries
66 from the host corrupting the new tools and allows for the possibility of
67 building both 32-bit and 64-bit libraries on 64-bit capable hardware.</para>
68 </listitem>
69 <listitem>
70 <para>Careful manipulation of <command>gcc</command>'s
71 <filename>specs</filename> file tells the compiler which target dynamic
72 linker will be used</para>
73 </listitem>
74 </itemizedlist>
75
76 <para>Binutils is installed first because the <command>configure</command>
77 runs of both GCC and Glibc perform various feature tests on the assembler
78 and linker to determine which software features to enable or disable. This
79 is more important than one might first realize. An incorrectly configured
80 GCC or Glibc can result in a subtly broken toolchain, where the impact of
81 such breakage might not show up until near the end of the build of an
82 entire distribution. A test suite failure will usually highlight this error
83 before too much additional work is performed.</para>
84
85 <para>Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations,
86 <filename class="directory">/tools/bin</filename> and <filename
87 class="directory">/tools/$LFS_TGT/bin</filename>. The tools in one
88 location are hard linked to the other. An important facet of the linker is
89 its library search order. Detailed information can be obtained from
90 <command>ld</command> by passing it the <parameter>--verbose</parameter>
91 flag. For example, an <userinput>ld --verbose | grep SEARCH</userinput>
92 will illustrate the current search paths and their order. It shows which
93 files are linked by <command>ld</command> by compiling a dummy program and
94 passing the <parameter>--verbose</parameter> switch to the linker. For example,
95 <userinput>gcc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose 2&gt;&amp;1 | grep succeeded</userinput>
96 will show all the files successfully opened during the linking.</para>
97
98 <para>The next package installed is GCC. An example of what can be
99 seen during its run of <command>configure</command> is:</para>
100
101<screen><computeroutput>checking what assembler to use...
102 /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/as
103checking what linker to use... /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld</computeroutput></screen>
104
105 <para>This is important for the reasons mentioned above. It also demonstrates
106 that GCC's configure script does not search the PATH directories to find which
107 tools to use. However, during the actual operation of <command>gcc</command>
108 itself, the same search paths are not necessarily used. To find out which
109 standard linker <command>gcc</command> will use, run:
110 <userinput>gcc -print-prog-name=ld</userinput>.</para>
111
112 <para>Detailed information can be obtained from <command>gcc</command> by
113 passing it the <parameter>-v</parameter> command line option while compiling
114 a dummy program. For example, <userinput>gcc -v dummy.c</userinput> will show
115 detailed information about the preprocessor, compilation, and assembly stages,
116 including <command>gcc</command>'s included search paths and their order.</para>
117
118 <para>The next package installed is Glibc. The most important considerations
119 for building Glibc are the compiler, binary tools, and kernel headers. The
120 compiler is generally not an issue since Glibc will always use the
121 <command>gcc</command> found in a <envar>PATH</envar> directory. The binary
122 tools and kernel headers can be a bit more complicated. Therefore, take no
123 risks and use the available configure switches to enforce the correct
124 selections. After the run of <command>configure</command>, check the contents
125 of the <filename>config.make</filename> file in the <filename
126 class="directory">glibc-build</filename> directory for all important details.
127 Note the use of <parameter>CC="gcc -B/tools/bin/"</parameter> to control which
128 binary tools are used and the use of the <parameter>-nostdinc</parameter>
129 and <parameter>-isystem</parameter> flags to control the compiler's include
130 search path. These items highlight an important aspect of the Glibc
131 package&mdash;it is very self-sufficient in terms of its build machinery and
132 generally does not rely on toolchain defaults.</para>
133
134 <para>After the Glibc installation, make some adjustments to ensure that
135 searching and linking take place only within the <filename
136 class="directory">/tools</filename> prefix. Install an adjusted
137 <command>ld</command>, which has a hard-wired search path limited to
138 <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. Then amend
139 <command>gcc</command>'s specs file to point to the new dynamic linker in
140 <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. This last step is vital
141 to the whole process. As mentioned above, a hard-wired path to a dynamic
142 linker is embedded into every Executable and Link Format (ELF)-shared
143 executable. This can be inspected by running:
144 <userinput>readelf -l &lt;name of binary&gt; | grep interpreter</userinput>.
145 Amending gcc's specs file ensures that every program compiled from here
146 through the end of this chapter will use the new dynamic linker in
147 <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>.</para>
148
149 <para>For the second pass of GCC, its sources also need to be modified
150 to tell GCC to use the new dynamic linker. Failure to do
151 so will result in the GCC programs themselves having the name of the
152 dynamic linker from the host system's <filename
153 class="directory">/lib</filename> directory embedded into them, which
154 would defeat the goal of getting away from the host.</para>
155
156 <para>During the second pass of Binutils, we are able to utilize the
157 <parameter>--with-lib-path</parameter> configure switch to control
158 <command>ld</command>'s library search path. From this point onwards,
159 the core toolchain is self-contained and self-hosted. The remainder of
160 the <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> packages all build against
161 the new Glibc in <filename class="directory">/tools</filename>.</para>
162
163 <para>Upon entering the chroot environment in <xref
164 linkend="chapter-building-system"/>, the first major package to be
165 installed is Glibc, due to its self-sufficient nature mentioned above.
166 Once this Glibc is installed into <filename
167 class="directory">/usr</filename>, perform a quick changeover of the
168 toolchain defaults, then proceed in building the rest of the target
169 LFS system.</para>
170
171 <!-- FIXME: Removed as part of the fix for bug 1061 - we no longer build pass1
172 packages statically, therefore this explanation isn't required
173
174 <sect2>
175 <title>Notes on Static Linking</title>
176
177 <para>Besides their specific task, most programs have to perform many
178 common and sometimes trivial operations. These include allocating
179 memory, searching directories, reading and writing files, string
180 handling, pattern matching, arithmetic, and other tasks. Instead of
181 obliging each program to reinvent the wheel, the GNU system provides
182 all these basic functions in ready-made libraries. The major library
183 on any Linux system is Glibc.</para>
184
185 <para>There are two primary ways of linking the functions from a
186 library to a program that uses them&mdash;statically or dynamically. When
187 a program is linked statically, the code of the used functions is
188 included in the executable, resulting in a rather bulky program. When
189 a program is dynamically linked, it includes a reference to the
190 dynamic linker, the name of the library, and the name of the function,
191 resulting in a much smaller executable. A third option is to use the
192 programming interface of the dynamic linker (see <filename>dlopen(3)</filename>
193 for more information).</para>
194
195 <para>Dynamic linking is the default on Linux and has three major
196 advantages over static linking. First, only one copy of the executable
197 library code is needed on the hard disk, instead of having multiple
198 copies of the same code included in several programs, thus saving
199 disk space. Second, when several programs use the same library
200 function at the same time, only one copy of the function's code is
201 required in core, thus saving memory space. Third, when a library
202 function gets a bug fixed or is otherwise improved, only the one
203 library needs to be recompiled instead of recompiling all programs
204 that make use of the improved function.</para>
205
206 <para>If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we
207 statically link the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons
208 are threefold&mdash;historical, educational, and technical. The
209 historical reason is that earlier versions of LFS statically linked
210 every program in this chapter. Educationally, knowing the difference
211 between static and dynamic linking is useful. The technical benefit is
212 a gained element of independence from the host, meaning that those
213 programs can be used independently of the host system. However, it is
214 worth noting that an overall successful LFS build can still be
215 achieved when the first two packages are built dynamically.</para>
216
217 </sect2>-->
218
219</sect1>
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.