Changeset 6267e8e

Timestamp:

10/08/2003 04:49:02 AM (21 years ago)

Author:

Greg Schafer <greg@…>

Branches:

10.0, 10.0-rc1, 10.1, 10.1-rc1, 11.0, 11.0-rc1, 11.0-rc2, 11.0-rc3, 11.1, 11.1-rc1, 11.2, 11.2-rc1, 11.3, 11.3-rc1, 12.0, 12.0-rc1, 12.1, 12.1-rc1, 6.0, 6.1, 6.1.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.5-systemd, 7.6, 7.6-systemd, 7.7, 7.7-systemd, 7.8, 7.8-systemd, 7.9, 7.9-systemd, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, arm, bdubbs/gcc13, ml-11.0, multilib, renodr/libudev-from-systemd, s6-init, trunk, v5_0, v5_1, v5_1_1, xry111/arm64, xry111/arm64-12.0, xry111/clfs-ng, xry111/lfs-next, xry111/loongarch, xry111/loongarch-12.0, xry111/loongarch-12.1, xry111/mips64el, xry111/pip3, xry111/rust-wip-20221008, xry111/update-glibc

Children:

2723b39

Parents:

76b9eb4

Message:

Text adjustment.

git-svn-id: ​http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@2945 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689

Files:

• chapter05/lockingglibc.xml (modified) (1 diff)
• chapter06/adjustingtoolchain.xml (modified) (1 diff)

chapter05/lockingglibc.xml

@@ -60 +60 @@
 <blockquote><screen>[Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]</screen></blockquote>
 
-<para>If you did not receive the output as shown above, then something is
-seriously wrong. This includes if the output of the command is blank!
-You will need to investigate and retrace your steps to find
-out where the problem is and correct it. There is no point in continuing
-until this is done. Most likely something went wrong with the specs file
-amendment above. Note especially that <filename>/tools/lib</filename> appears
-as the prefix of our dynamic linker. Of course, if you are working on a
+<para>If you did not receive the output as shown above, or received no output at
+all, then something is seriously wrong. You will need to investigate and retrace
+your steps to find out where the problem is and correct it. There is no point in
+continuing until this is done. Most likely something went wrong with the specs
+file amendment above. Note especially that <filename>/tools/lib</filename>
+appears as the prefix of our dynamic linker. Of course, if you are working on a
 platform where the name of the dynamic linker is something other than
-<filename>ld-linux.so.2</filename>, then the output will be slightly different.
-</para>
+<filename>ld-linux.so.2</filename>, then the output will be slightly
+different.</para>
 
 <para>Once you are satisfied that all is well, clean up the test files:</para>

chapter06/adjustingtoolchain.xml

@@ -70 +70 @@
 <blockquote><screen>[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2]</screen></blockquote>
 
-<para>If you did not receive the output as shown above, then something is
-seriously wrong. This includes the output of the above command being empty!
-You will need to investigate and retrace your steps to find
-out where the problem is and correct it. There is no point in continuing
-until this is done. Most likely something went wrong with the specs file
-amendment above. Note especially that <filename>/lib</filename> now appears as
-the prefix of our dynamic linker. Of course, if you are working on a platform
+<para>If you did not receive the output as shown above, or received no output at
+all, then something is seriously wrong. You will need to investigate and retrace
+your steps to find out where the problem is and correct it. There is no point in
+continuing until this is done. Most likely something went wrong with the specs
+file amendment above. Note especially that <filename>/lib</filename> now appears
+as the prefix of our dynamic linker. Of course, if you are working on a platform
 where the name of the dynamic linker is something other than
 <filename>ld-linux.so.2</filename>, then the output will be slightly