id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	severity	resolution	keywords	cc
1576	/etc/inputrc text a bit long-winded?	archaic@…	archaic@…	"This page seems overly pedantic. Perhaps assuming /etc/inputrc and just
mentioning ~/.inputrc in passing would be more in line with standard assumptions
about the user's level of knowledge? Also, the book doesn't create /etc/skel.
BLFS has a fine page for that at:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/skel.html

Should we remove reference to /etc/skel?"	defect	closed	lowest		Book	TESTING	normal	fixed