Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 4 years ago
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Further to my initial comment on -support, Fedora is using 1.23 so this seems to be just a new location, and 1.9 versions are development. But I too have no problem with dropping this.
comment:3 by , 4 years ago
FWIW, I'd be OK with dropping this - although I've never used it, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. I have used enscript though.
comment:4 by , 4 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Commented out a2ps and psutils at revision 22889, but did not archive yet.
Marking fixed, but we may want to bring these back.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I'll note here that psutils is only used in a2ps. That package in turn has not been updated since 2007. I have used a2ps in the past because it prints out source code in a 2up format nicely, but I have not used it in a few years.
An alternative to a2ps is enscript, which has been stable since 2012.
Consider dropping a2ps and psutils from the book.