#4077 closed enhancement (fixed)
tcl/tk-8.6.1
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Fernando de Oliveira | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | BOOK | Version: | SVN |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
New point version for both packages
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
Both hanged, at the end of the tests and exit with errors which are apparently the same. That is whye I asked. Tail of the errors below and diff at the bottom.
==== focusTcl-3.9 tk_focusPrev procedure, basic tree traversal FAILED
==== Contents of test case:
setup1 .
tk_focusPrev .a
---- Test generated error; Return code was: 1
---- Return code should have been one of: 0 2
---- errorInfo: can't invoke "destroy" command: application has been destroyed
while executing
"destroy $w.$i"
(procedure "setup1" line 6)
invoked from within
"setup1 ."
("uplevel" body line 2)
invoked from within
"uplevel 1 $script"
---- errorCode: NONE
---- Test cleanup failed:
can't invoke "destroy" command: application has been destroyed
---- errorInfo(cleanup): can't invoke "destroy" command: application has been destroyed
while executing
"destroy $w.$i"
(procedure "cleanup1" line 6)
invoked from within
"cleanup1 ."
("uplevel" body line 2)
invoked from within
"uplevel 1 $cleanup"
---- errorCode(cleanup): NONE
==== focusTcl-3.9 FAILED
Error in startup script: can't invoke "winfo" command: application has been destroyed
while executing
"winfo children ."
(procedure "deleteWindows" line 2)
invoked from within
"deleteWindows"
(file "/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2013.09.25-09h52m12s/tk8.6.1/tests/focusTcl.test" line 267)
invoked from within
"::source /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2013.09.25-09h52m12s/tk8.6.1/tests/focusTcl.test"
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
"uplevel 1 [list ::source $file]"
(procedure "tcltest::runAllTests" line 3)
invoked from within
"tcltest::runAllTests"
(file "/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2013.09.25-09h52m12s/tk8.6.1/unix/../tests/all.tcl" line 20)
make: ** [test-classic] Erro 1
$ diff -Nau Downloads/blfs/tk-8.6.0-2013.09.24-10h06m43s-failed-tests.log Downloads/blfs/tk-8.6.1-2013.09.25-09h52m12s-failed-tests.log --- Downloads/blfs/tk-8.6.0-2013.09.24-10h06m43s-failed-tests.log 2013-09-25 11:27:32.983010051 -0300 +++ Downloads/blfs/tk-8.6.1-2013.09.25-09h52m12s-failed-tests.log 2013-09-25 11:25:44.985004276 -0300 @@ -1,13 +1,7 @@ -==== bitmap-4.1 FreeBitmapObjProc FAILED -==== bitmap-4.1 FAILED -==== border-3.1 FreeBorderObjProc FAILED -==== border-3.1 FAILED ==== button-5.24 ConfigureButton - computing geometry FAILED ==== button-5.24 FAILED ==== canvText-20.1 angled text bounding box FAILED ==== canvText-20.1 FAILED -==== cursor-4.1 FreeCursorObjProc FAILED -==== cursor-4.1 FAILED ==== entry-3.6 EntryWidgetCmd procedure, "bbox" widget command FAILED ==== entry-3.6 FAILED ==== entry-3.7 EntryWidgetCmd procedure, "bbox" widget command FAILED
comment:5 by , 11 years ago
OK, thanks. I will wait until later tonight, if there are no objections from Bruce or Ken, I will do it. Perhaps not today, I need to update OJDK, as Icedtea-2.4.2 has been released, and this one takes many hours to build and run the tests (hopefully without new problems).
comment:6 by , 11 years ago
We currently don't recommend the tests, so I don't see a reason not to update. I'll take a look to see if I can spot why at least some of the tests fail. We may want to report the problem upstream if we can spot something definitive.
comment:7 by , 11 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|
I missed that sentence "Running the tests is not recommended". Since the previous version, I was wanting to update this pair and would already have done it in both versions if had noticed it before. I understand you agree that I can do it.
comment:8 by , 11 years ago
An interesting observation. I went back and redid tcl as prep to redo tk and one test failed. I dug in and it was saying / was not owned by root. LOL. Sure enough, it wasn't. It was owned by me from a previosu LFS build.
In any case, all the tcl tests now pass. I'll look at tk next.
comment:9 by , 11 years ago
OK, I ran the tests and had 41 failures. My failures are significantly different from yours, although some are the same.
For instance, you failed a lot of focusTcl tests, but I didn't fail any. I failed a lot of unixfont and scrollbar tests but you didn't fail any. We both failed the same focus tests.
I think the tests are highly dependent on the screen resolution/capabilities, fonts installed, etc. We should probably say that failures will be indicated in the tests depending on these issues and will vary for different systems.
I was trying to update these packages. They build, install and work fine, at least for the package I need tk.
Tests are fine for tcl, but for tk, many have failed and the last one hangs untill I close by hand the window with two buttons. Have looked at ArchLinux, and the "make test" is commented, there for tk, but not for tcl.
I have:
Can I update the packages with these failed tests?