#4368 closed enhancement (fixed)
freetype-2.5.1
Reported by: | Fernando de Oliveira | Owned by: | Fernando de Oliveira |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | BOOK | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
I suggest discussing this sort of problem on the -dev list!
My initial thoughts are that if you upgrade, either the library is compatible and existing (already-compiled) users will link to it, or alternatively it is a new version (unlikely) and they will still use the old one.
For the headers, with 2.5.0.1 mine installed to /usr/include/freetype2/freetype, so I guess it has lost the redundant directory. In theory, everything should be using a sane approach to find the headers, but I'm sure some packages will have issues. If so, those packages need to be (conditionally) fixed.
comment:5 by , 11 years ago
OK, thanks, next time I will discuss there.
However, things are better than I thought.
Built: Fontconfig-2.11.0 Imlib2-1.4.5 Graphviz-2.34.0 libass-0.10.2 agg-2.5 ghostscript-9.10, so, everything seems to be fine.
So, with a minor modification in one sed, only the statistics and version numbers need modification.
Shall I update, or open a discussion in -dev?
comment:6 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Thanks, ĸen and Bruce.
Fixed at r12281.
I am having a funny time with this ticket (as Ken says).
There is a fundamental modification:
I am not sure how to proceed. Have not yet installed it nor tested the other packages dependent on this one.
I will install and test how packages work. Alternatives I am considering:
Help is surely needed with this issue. Thanks in advance.
This is the firs time I come across such a modification.