goffice-0.10.12

[Fernando de Oliveira]

​http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/goffice/0.10/goffice-0.10.11.news

I am planning to update this one, there is no modification:

​http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/goffice/0.10/goffice-0.10.11.changes

2014-02-16 Morten Welinder <terra@…>

• Release 0.10.11

2014-02-11 Morten Welinder <terra@…>

• configure.ac: Post-release bump.

[Armin K]

The package was released to match gnumeric release number. Unless you are going to upgrade Gnumeric too, there's really no point in upgrading this package.

[Fernando de Oliveira]

OK. Then, I am going to modify this to 7.6. Thank you very much and sorry for my mistake in the other ticket.

[Fernando de Oliveira]

Forgot to give back to the book.

[Fernando de Oliveira]

​http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/goffice/0.10/goffice-0.10.12.news

[Fernando de Oliveira]

There is a problem with goffice with DESTDIR. It has installed:

ls
home  usr

I am at

/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.03.06-16h40m55s/DEST-goffice-0.10.12

fernando [ ~/tmp/paco-build-2014.03.06-16h40m55s/DEST-goffice-0.10.12 ]$ tree home/
home/
└── fernando
    └── tmp
        └── paco-build-2014.03.06-16h40m55s
            └── DEST-goffice-0.10.12
                └── usr
                    └── share
                        └── goffice
                            └── 0.10.12
                                └── mmlitex
                                    ├── cmarkup.xsl
                                    ├── entities.xsl
                                    ├── glayout.xsl
                                    ├── mmlitex.xsl
                                    ├── README
                                    ├── scripts.xsl
                                    ├── tables.xsl
                                    └── tokens.xsl

Problem is that the directory is really installed

$ ls /usr/share/goffice/0.10.12/mmlitex
cmarkup.xsl   glayout.xsl  README       tables.xsl
entities.xsl  mmlitex.xsl  scripts.xsl  tokens.xsl

Is it woth adding any comment about not using DESTDIR?

Perhaps I have missed that directory in BLFS-7.5. Is it worth am errata only for this?

[bdubbs@…]

If the package does not honor DESTDIR, then I think it is worth mentioning.

[Fernando de Oliveira]

Fixed at r12831.

OK, I will add a comment just before make install.

Fixed at r12832. Update to goffice-0.10.12. Revert modifications to archived goffice.

[Fernando de Oliveira]

Forgot: thank you, Bruce.