Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
I don't mind getting an amdgpu board that fills this need. Can someone suggest a good one?
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
AFAICS, the native amdgpu "chipsets" are Polaris and later. I'm thinking about getting one, with a Ryzen, later this year - but for me the initial problem is that they are all DisplayPort (and HDMI), my current monitor is D-Sub so it will probably be some time before I get things sorted.
I bet Douglas knows more about this, but I was thinking about getting a low-end RX460. No idea which are "best", but see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_400_series. There are reports from December of a Polaris 12, but I can't see any articles that identify which AMD model, or manufacturers' cards, are Polaris 12.
And in theory my Kaveri can probably run amdgpu, but for that radeon is the preferred stable driver.
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
Summary: | libdrm-2.4.79 (Hold for too many releases-recheck in May) → libdrm-2.4.80 (Hold for too many releases-recheck in May) |
---|
Now at 2.4.80, since April 14th. Release notes:
Christian Gmeiner (1): configure.ac: bump version for release Eric Engestrom (1): intel: remove dead code Philipp Zabel (2): etnaviv: sync uapi header etnaviv: add fence fd support Tobias Jakobi (1): exynos: add C++ support to exynos_drmif header
Not sure those are needed, but the seems to have been stable for more than 3 weeks.
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
Milestone: | hold → 8.1 |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
Summary: | libdrm-2.4.80 (Hold for too many releases-recheck in May) → libdrm-2.4.80 |
Will do
Release announcement for 2.4.79 is at e.g. https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-April/138561.html -
Since we don't (yet) support amdgpu, no problem with holding off for this version but it's nice to have release notes.