Opened 23 years ago

Closed 20 years ago

#180 closed defect (wontfix)

suggestion: incorporate LSB test in LFS

Reported by: gerard@… Owned by: lfs-book@…
Priority: lowest Milestone:
Component: Book Version: CVS
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc:

Description

Change History (5)

comment:1 by gerard@…, 23 years ago

Resolution: later
Status: newclosed

comment:2 by gerard@…, 23 years ago

Resolution: later
Status: closedreopened

comment:3 by gerard@…, 22 years ago

Priority: normallowest

comment:4 by greg@…, 21 years ago

Why do we want this incorporated into LFS? The idea of an LFS system passing the LSB test suite sounds nice in principle, but it won't achieve anything useful from what I can tell. It is oriented towards binary distros who operate as companies. Additionally, there are a number of problems according to here:

http://www.linuxbase.org/test/lsb-runtime-test-faq.html

  • the test suite is supplied as binary in RPM format
  • it takes 7 hours to run
  • the "pax" program must be installed

Actually getting certified looks to be quite complicated with all sorts of administrivia involved. At this stage, I think the best we can hope for is to make LFS as close as possible to conforming to an "LSB Runtime Environment" so that any "LSB Application" will install and run properly.

Interesting tidbit: Debian is not currently listed in the Certification Register:

http://www.opengroup.org/lsb/cert/cert_prodlist.tpl

comment:5 by gerard@…, 20 years ago

Resolution: wontfix
Status: reopenedclosed

The idea was good at the time, but it's more effort than I am willing to spend on it at this point in time. Agree with proposal and closing.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.