#1930 closed task (fixed)
glibc-2.5 branch update
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Matthew Burgess | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Book | Version: | SVN |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
There's a patch in the patches repo which was created by comparing glibc-2.5 release with the glibc-2.5 cvs branch. It includes several bug fixes, and I suggest LFS uses it.
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
| Milestone: | → 6.3 |
|---|
comment:2 by , 17 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
Matthew, I rediffed against the glibc-2_5-branch the other day. The patch is large, but there haven't been any commits in about a month. So, maybe it's pretty close to a pseudo-2.5.1. I put it here:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dnicholson/glibc-2.5-branch_update-2.patch
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
Thanks Dan. Would you mind committing that to the patches repo please? Again, although it's a large patch, there's a lot of stuff like timezone, translation and testcases in there that bulk it up somewhat.
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
Well, the message didn't go through because the patch is too big. But it's in the repo.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/glibc/glibc-2.5-branch_update-2.patch
Please test it as I just diffed and haven't gotten a chance to build it yet.
comment:7 by , 17 years ago
Thanks Dan. I'll be testing this over the next couple of days along with the GCC upgrade and DB patch. Should be in a position to commit the changes on Saturday, all going well.
OK, we need to deal with this for 6.3 as I can't see anything in the glibc mail archives of immediate plans for a 2.5.1 release. While I'm not going to pretend to grok libc internals, the details in the Changelog suggest the patch is fairly conservative.