Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#2077 closed enhancement (fixed)
Util-Linux-NG-2.13.1
Reported by: | Matthew Burgess | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 7.0 |
Component: | Book | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
Util-Linux has been under new maintainership for some time now, under the name of Util-Linux-NG. A stable version, 2.13, is now out. See http://www.mail-archive.com/util-linux-ng%40vger.kernel.org/msg00583.html for the announcement email. The tarball is at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/v2.13. Not build or boot tested yet, but visual inspection shows that both of our patches can be dropped if this version is used.
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
comment:2 by , 17 years ago
A 'new' version of Util-Linux-NG is available, 2.13.0.1, released on 22/10/2007
Judging by the release notes, the only change is a fix for proper privilege dropping when making {,u}mount calls
More detailed info here:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/v2.13/v2.13.0.1-ChangeLog ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/v2.13/v2.13.0.1-ReleaseNotes
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
Just a note that anybody using nfs will need a recent nfs-utils (1.1.0 or newer).
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
Now (and finally after a few stages), version 2.13.1 is out and ready to test, released as of 16/01/2008
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/v2.13/util-linux-ng-2.13.1.tar.bz2
More detailed info here:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/v2.13/v2.13.1-ChangeLog ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/v2.13/v2.13.1-ReleaseNotes
Julio
comment:5 by , 17 years ago
Summary: | Util-Linux-NG-2.13 → Util-Linux-NG-2.13.1 |
---|
See some similar discussion on the DIY dev list.
http://www.diy-linux.org/pipermail/diy-linux-dev/2007-September/001091.html
An important thing here is that since mount depends on either e2fsprogs or udev, one of them needs to be added to Ch. 5 if we want mount early in the chroot. There's not actually any strict reason to need mount, though, since we use the host's mount to setup the chroot.