#617 closed enhancement (wontfix)
Printing unknown elements
Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | lowest | Milestone: | |
Component: | nALFS - Back End (XML Handlers) | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | minor | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Printing of unknown elements while running should be done by default, and it should be an error, not just a warning.
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 21 years ago
qa_contact: | alfs-discuss@linuxfromscratch.org → alfs-log@linuxfromscratch.org |
---|
comment:2 by , 21 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Version: | CVS → 1.1.7 |
comment:3 by , 21 years ago
Version: | 1.1.7 → CVS |
---|
comment:4 by , 21 years ago
Consider adding ValidateDTD() support, or just make the better use of parameters and attributes described in handler_info_s.
comment:5 by , 20 years ago
Version: | CVS → SVN |
---|
comment:6 by , 20 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
As profile validation before parsing would be a major enhancement, this will be put off until nALFS2.
comment:7 by , 20 years ago
Milestone: | → nALFS2 |
---|---|
Resolution: | wontfix |
Severity: | normal → enhancement |
Status: | closed → new |
Reopening and making it an eng req.
comment:8 by , 12 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Resolution: | → wontfix |
Status: | new → closed |
{n,}ALFS is not developped anymore
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Printing unknown elements _after_parsing_the_profile_ is spammy. We should make a list of those, then print just the first one and the number of unknown elements found.