1 | | |
| 1 | With all due respect to the very fine work Dan has done |
| 2 | so far, I did not realize that a *different* version of |
| 3 | Linux-PAM was necessary. This puts me 100% against the |
| 4 | idea now. The reason being is I don't believe we can |
| 5 | support it properly. Additionally, it means we need to |
| 6 | update whenever RedHat releases an updated rev or adds |
| 7 | a patch. To me, it simply isn't worth it. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I'm now for just leaving things the way they are and |
| 10 | moving on without even a mention of pam_console in the |
| 11 | book, other than perhaps a note saying to check out the |
| 12 | Wiki for the (many) changes required if you want to use |
| 13 | pam_console. |