Change History (7)
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
It's an optional dependency in subversion. I don't see why libgnome-keyring shouldn't be archived and make it an external optional dependency in subversion.
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 11 years ago
Thanks. Now I see that I had got subversion when grepping. I agree with archiving. Not sure about all needed to do it. Should we wait a little more for possible objections?
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Replying to fo:
Thanks. Now I see that I had got subversion when grepping. I agree with archiving. Not sure about all needed to do it. Should we wait a little more for possible objections?
Yes, let's wait a couple of days.
comment:5 by , 11 years ago
Summary: | libgnome-keyring-3.10.1 → Archive libgnome-keyring-3.10.0 |
---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I failed find an application or library that depends on this. Just the "make check" is enough to be sure it is working?