Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#7181 closed enhancement (fixed)
libtirpc-1.0.1
| Reported by: | Fernando de Oliveira | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 7.9 |
| Component: | BOOK | Version: | SVN |
| Severity: | medium | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libtirpc/libtirpc/1.0.1/libtirpc-1.0.1.tar.bz2
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libtirpc/libtirpc/1.0.1/Release-1.0.1.txt
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg55089.html
Subject: ANNOUNCE: libtirpc-1.0.1 released.
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:51:54 -0400
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello,
The 1.0.1 version of libtirpc has just been release.
In this release the SONAME has been changed to 3.0.0 to
reflect a number of changes in the API. Those changes
were needed to make the Linux version of libtirpc
more compatible with other implementations
The is also a number of bug fixes including fixing
several memory leaks.
The tarball:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libtirpc/files/libtirpc/1.0.1/libtirpc-1.0.1.tar.bz2
Release notes:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libtirpc/files/libtirpc/1.0.1/Release-0.3.2.txt
The git tree is at:
git://linux-nfs.org/~steved/libtirpc
steved.
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → new |
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
I'll take a look at this issue.
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Fixed at revision 16695. The new version requires a patch to the existing rpcbind, but that patch is from the upstream repository and will be in the next rpcbind version.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.

I am not sure of doing this. IIRC, I had a problem with rpcbind in the past, and this seems to affect it:
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/do_not_use_the_xp_auth_pointer_directly.diff?h=packages/rpcbind
Sorry, but I'm giving back to the book.
This will allow us to discuss if we need this now, or if someone can take the ticket and do it properly.