#11845 closed enhancement (fixed)
LLVM-8.0.0
Reported by: | Douglas R. Reno | Owned by: | Bruce Dubbs |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 9.0 |
Component: | BOOK | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
New major version. Exercise caution.
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
Possibly. I regard rebuilding rustc for this as churn. It also needs to be tested by someone who has llvm-8 installed (I don't, and I'm not likely to have that for some weeks), and from memory Bruce apparently built rustc without problems, but then he later did run into problems.
On that basis, I think we should let people like Arch try it out first ;-)
OTOH, whenever rustc *needs* to be updated to a newer version (presumably for a new major version of firefox) then system llvm will be worth retrying.
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Replying to ken@…:
Possibly. I regard rebuilding rustc for this as churn. It also needs to be tested by someone who has llvm-8 installed (I don't, and I'm not likely to have that for some weeks), and from memory Bruce apparently built rustc without problems, but then he later did run into problems.
On that basis, I think we should let people like Arch try it out first ;-)
I just tried. It requires a large patch to make rustc-1.33 build with llvm-8 because some llvm API changes. It may be why the Arch guys are still using llvm-7.
rustc-1.34 will work.
Release notes are at http://releases.llvm.org/8.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Fixed at revision 21373.