#13222 closed defect (fixed)
xf86-video-intel-20200218 (and others) file format
Reported by: | thomas | Owned by: | Bruce Dubbs |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 10.0 |
Component: | BOOK | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description (last modified by ) ¶
The download file is named xf86-video-intel-20200218.tar.xz
but it is a bzip2-compressed file:
$ file /mnt/LFS/conglomeration/xf86-video-intel-20200218.tar.xz /mnt/LFS/conglomeration/xf86-video-intel-20200218.tar.xz: bzip2 compressed data, block size = 900k
So, either name of compression-type is not what it should be.
It does not harm if "tar -xf <tarball>" is used. That might be the reason why it hasn't came up so far. But it breaks if doing "tar -xJf <tarball>". The capital 'J' is what the extension of .xz suggests.
That breaks scripts which are using the file naming to prepare options for the tar command. Regardless if that approach (using "extensions" for controlling script functionality) is good or not, we should not mix extensions/file-formats.
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
Summary: | xf86-video-intel-20200218 file format → xf86-video-intel-20200218 (and others) file format |
---|
comment:2 by , 5 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:3 by , 5 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
I'll repackage an update the md5sum/file size.
comment:5 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
comment:6 by , 5 years ago
Thank you for taking care of this Bruce. I'm going to go read the manpage to make sure I use the correct options next time :)
Same for cairo-1.17.2+f93fc72c03e.tar.xz