Opened 22 months ago
Closed 22 months ago
#17308 closed enhancement (fixed)
js-102.5.0
| Reported by: | Bruce Dubbs | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | elevated | Milestone: | 11.3 |
| Component: | BOOK | Version: | git |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
New minor version.
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 22 months ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Priority: | normal → elevated |
| Status: | new → assigned |
follow-up: 4 comment:2 by , 22 months ago
My normal machine is still on python-3.10, so I'll use the measurements from an intel with 3.11. There, the size is bigger, and over 200 items in the first test report UNEXPECTED failures, on the AMD with 3.10 only 8 such failures.
For the avoidance of doubt, both are on 6.0.x kernels and not using my own CFLAGS etc.
comment:3 by , 22 months ago
This is what I have for the current version:
601.3 Elapsed Time - firefox-102.4.0esr.source md5sum : 5ad962e43ad29245238feeba558941d9 /usr/src/firefox/firefox-102.4.0esr.source.tar.xz 470824 /usr/src/firefox/firefox-102.4.0esr.source.tar.xz SIZE (459.789 MB) 7170696 kilobytes BUILD SIZE (7002.632 MB) SBU=6.396 hostname: lfs11 BFLAGS=-j16
Current instructions worked fine for me. The kernel is 6.0.7.
follow-up: 5 comment:4 by , 22 months ago
Replying to ken@…:
My normal machine is still on python-3.10, so I'll use the measurements from an intel with 3.11. There, the size is bigger, and over 200 items in the first test report UNEXPECTED failures, on the AMD with 3.10 only 8 such failures.
For the avoidance of doubt, both are on 6.0.x kernels and not using my own CFLAGS etc.
Do you have the same ICU version on the systems?
follow-up: 7 comment:5 by , 22 months ago
Replying to Xi Ruoyao:
Replying to ken@…:
My normal machine is still on python-3.10, so I'll use the measurements from an intel with 3.11. There, the size is bigger, and over 200 items in the first test report UNEXPECTED failures, on the AMD with 3.10 only 8 such failures.
For the avoidance of doubt, both are on 6.0.x kernels and not using my own CFLAGS etc.
Do you have the same ICU version on the systems?
Good question - I thought about this when lucidly awake during sleep. The amd has 71.1 (hoping to update the system in the next couple of weeks). On the up-to-date intel I misread the number of failures (112) and they are indeed all related to Date/Time. Unfortunately I threw away the build on the amd, rerunning and trying without the sed (it only affects one file which is outside js) - confirm that is NOT needed (DESTDIR install). Running tests now.
Running tests now
comment:6 by , 22 months ago
"over 100" seems right. I also omitted the '--wpt=disabled' on the intel. Sorry for the noise.
comment:7 by , 22 months ago
Replying to ken@…: Unfortunately I threw away the build on the amd, rerunning and trying without the sed (it only affects one file which is outside js) - confirm that is NOT needed (DESTDIR install).
Insert expletives here. Of course it wasn't needed, that is the machine still on python-3.10. On 3.11 configure blows up without it. <sigh/>
comment:9 by , 22 months ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Security Advisory SA11.2-042 created.
The fix for CVE-2022-45406: Use-after-free of a JavaScript Realm reported in the fixes for firefox-102.5.0 #17306 is in the js/src code and therefore also applies to js-102.5.0. Rated high.