Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
#2189 closed defect (fixed)
MC-4.6.1 UTF-8 patch is now good enough
Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 6.2.0 |
Component: | BOOK | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description ¶
Finally, Debian managed to knock a large percentage of bugs out of the UTF-8 patch for MC. The new instructions are available at the MC Wiki page: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/MC
The patched MC works acceptably well (but not perfectly) in both UTF-8 and traditional 8-bit locales. However, it is better to play safe and include a new page about the patched MC, instead of adding the patch and changed instructions on the existing page. So that there are pages in the book with the titles "MC-4.6.1" and "MC-4.6.1 with Debian UTF-8 patches".
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
Type: | task → defect |
---|
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
comment:3 by , 18 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
Indeed, it is possible to push everything in one page. However, I think this would be better structured as:
- Introduction to MC
- Package Information
- Additional Downloads
- Do I Need the Patch?
- Vanilla MC Dependencies
- Dependencies of MC with Debian Patch
- Installation of Vanilla MC
- Command Explanations for Vanilla MC
- Installation of MC with Debian Patch
- Command Explanations for Patched MC
- Contents
Is this OK?
comment:5 by , 18 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I changed my mind and added instructions without the separate "with the patch" and "without the patch" sections.
Fixed (together with bash-3.2 incompatibility reported in the Wiki) in r6433.
I would much rather see something like:
For non UTF-8 installations, use these instructions:
... ... ...
For UTF-8 installations, use these instructions:
... ... ...
And, perhaps a better explanation in both sentences where it says "UTF-8 installations".
I think a second page is overkill.