Change History (11)
comment:1 by , 23 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 23 years ago
comment:3 by , 22 years ago
| Milestone: | → 1.0 |
|---|
comment:4 by , 22 years ago
i agree with you on this one mark - actually it was updated at the end of july, so for a GNU package its regularly updated ;-) - no offence to RMS *snigger*
Jay
comment:5 by , 21 years ago
ive sent a message to the "maintainer" of this part of the book. i plan to take maintainership of this part of the book if i dont get a reply (or he isnt interested in it any more)
Jay
comment:6 by , 21 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → new |
ok - i havnt got a reply so im taking ths one if anyone else has done something towards this one already than mail me privately and we can work together. i plan to use inetutils instead of netkit (unless there is a reason we should stick with netkit)
Jay
comment:7 by , 21 years ago
| Summary: | netkit-combo-0.17 → netkit-combo-0.17|inetutils-1.4.2 |
|---|
comment:8 by , 21 years ago
| Status: | new → assigned |
|---|
comment:9 by , 21 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I just want to make a comment on netkit-combo. I know that there've been several security vulnerabilities found in it recently so I was wondering (sorry to the person who is working on this) if we should move to using inetutils instead which at least is partially maintained..