#2690 closed defect (fixed)
udftools-1.0.0b3 no longer builds
Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | BOOK | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description (last modified by ) ¶
Some of this is gcc-4.3, some of it might even be the kernel header changes in 2.6.23.
Fedora has a metric shed load of changes to this. I tried cherry picking their changes to cdrwtool.c, and then pktsetup.c, but that just let it die in wrudf.c with
wrudf.c: In function `initialise': wrudf.c:248: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment make[1]: *** [wrudf.o] Error 1
I tried using parts of their warningfixes2.patch which makes some changes to wrudf.c, but the first hunk in that file doesn't apply (probably depends on another of their patches), and with that hunk dropped the rest of the patch makes no change to that error.
Upstream appears to be defunct. I don't have any interest in this package, so unless someone cares to fix it I think we should drop it.
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
Type: | task → defect |
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | assigned → new |
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Milestone: | 6.4 → 6.5 |
---|
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
Ken, is there still an issue with this? I just compiled it using the patch and the sed and it appears to be fine, the only additional issues were that the two files you mentioned needed limits.h.
comment:5 by , 16 years ago
Like I said, I don't have any interest in this package. I forget if someone reported a problem, or if I was just testing old things for 6.4. Whichever, it was obviously before I was attuned to the common need to add limits.h.
If you've got it working then I suggest you create a new patch which adds the effect of the sed and addslimits.h.
comment:6 by , 16 years ago
I don't use it personally, but if the fix is simple enough then I figure we might as well patch it. If it was being really stubborn then I would probably agree to drop it.
comment:7 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I've fixed the compilation issues but someone still needs to test it. Hopefully there's someone out there who uses it, if not at least it compiles.
Modified milestone from 6.4 to 6.5