#2867 closed task (fixed)
GDBM should be removed from BLFS
| Reported by: | Randy McMurchy | Owned by: | Randy McMurchy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | BOOK | Version: | SVN |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description (last modified by ) ¶
As GDBM is now in LFS, it is no longer needed in BLFS. We need to *comment* out all references of GDBM from the book. Don't remove them, but comment them out.
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 16 years ago
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
Replying to randy@…:
Commented out unnecessary references to GDBM. Keeping the ticket open until there's an answer from someone about the issue of Mutt building two backends.
As Guy said in -dev
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2009-July/019575.html
we should use --without-dbd --with-gdbm.
I can dot it in a few moments and you can close the ticket afterward.
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Fixed in r7848 and close the ticket. Feel free to correct any mistakes, all these with's and without's are at least confusing in the brain.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Commented out unnecessary references to GDBM. Keeping the ticket open until there's an answer from someone about the issue of Mutt building two backends.