Opened 15 years ago

Closed 13 years ago

Last modified 10 years ago

#2970 closed task (fixed)

Issues with EggDBus

Reported by: willimm Owned by: Randy McMurchy
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: BOOK Version: SVN
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc:

Description

There are issues with the eggdbus instructions:

  • Why is eggdbus called "DBUS Glib Bindings"? It should be called, plain and simply, eggdbus.
  • It needs a description. Can anyone think of one?
  • It also needs descriptions for the lib and the apps.
  • And, finaly, CBLFS mentions that Xmlto is one of the deps. Are they right? And if they are, does it need a patch to stop it from using xmlto?

Change History (7)

in reply to:  description ; comment:1 by Chris Staub, 15 years ago

Replying to willimm:

There are issues with the eggdbus instructions:

  • Why is eggdbus called "DBUS Glib Bindings"? It should be called, plain and simply, eggdbus.

It's called "D-Bus GObject Bindings", not "DBUS Glib Bindings." That's because that's what it is. From the .pc file it installs: "GObject bindings for D-Bus."

  • It needs a description. Can anyone think of one?

Why? None of the other D-Bus Bindings on that page have a description.

  • It also needs descriptions for the lib and the apps.

Funny, that would actually put BLFS ahead of the package devs, as the README, INSTALL, and various other files, including the one manpage it installs, all just say "Write me."

  • And, finaly, CBLFS mentions that Xmlto is one of the deps. Are they right? And if they are, does it need a patch to stop it from using xmlto?

CBLFS is incorrect - xmlto is not needed.

in reply to:  1 comment:2 by willimm, 15 years ago

Replying to chris@…:

Replying to willimm:

There are issues with the eggdbus instructions:

  • Why is eggdbus called "DBUS Glib Bindings"? It should be called, plain and simply, eggdbus.

It's called "D-Bus GObject Bindings", not "DBUS Glib Bindings." That's because that's what it is. From the .pc file it installs: "GObject bindings for D-Bus."

Case to point, it should also be refered to as eggdbus.

  • It needs a description. Can anyone think of one?

Why? None of the other D-Bus Bindings on that page have a description.

So I see.

  • It also needs descriptions for the lib and the apps.

Funny, that would actually put BLFS ahead of the package devs, as the README, INSTALL, and various other files, including the one manpage it installs, all just say "Write me."

Does this hinder us?

  • And, finaly, CBLFS mentions that Xmlto is one of the deps. Are they right? And if they are, does it need a patch to stop it from using xmlto?

CBLFS is incorrect - xmlto is not needed.

  1. I'll edit CBLFS.

comment:3 by (none), 13 years ago

Milestone: 6.5

Milestone 6.5 deleted

comment:4 by Randy McMurchy, 13 years ago

Milestone: 6.7

Updated milestone to 6.7

comment:5 by Randy McMurchy, 13 years ago

Owner: changed from blfs-book@… to Randy McMurchy
Status: newassigned
Summary: Issues with eggdbusIssues with EggDBus

I agree the package should be referenced as EggDBus. That is what the authors call it in the reference manual and in other documentation. If the .pc file says something else, then great. However, it appears the devs refer to the package as EggDBus.

comment:6 by Randy McMurchy, 13 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

Modified the instructions to reference the package as EggDBus. It is parenthetical in the first two instances, leaving the original name as well. All other references were changed to EggDBus.

comment:7 by bdubbs@…, 10 years ago

Milestone: 6.7

Milestone 6.7 deleted

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.