#318 closed defect (fixed)
need netfs init script
| Reported by: | DJ Lucas | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | BOOK | Version: | ~CVS |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description ¶
init script mounts netfs's in start, but has a mini sendsignals in stop to kill network dependent processes before unmounting network drives and bringing down the network.
As discussed starting at this thread, http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-dev/2002/10/0210.html and in this one: http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-support/2002/11/0348.html and another quite recently on blfs support (moved to blfs-dev). URL to be added when it gets to the archives.
Also, as an added bonus...take a look at this thread and see if it is usable as a replacemnt to the ifup-eth?, ifdown-eth? files. http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2003/03/0380.html
Change History (17)
comment:1 by , 22 years ago
| dependson: | → 57 |
|---|---|
| Priority: | normal → lowest |
comment:2 by , 22 years ago
| Milestone: | future → post-1.0 |
|---|---|
| Priority: | lowest → normal |
comment:3 by , 22 years ago
| attachments.isobsolete: | 0 → 1 |
|---|
by , 22 years ago
/etc/rc.d/init.d/netfs 1st idea (one line for each net fs type)
comment:4 by , 22 years ago
| attachments.isobsolete: | 0 → 1 |
|---|
by , 22 years ago
2nd idea for netfs (all up on one and all down on one line)
comment:5 by , 22 years ago
| attachments.isobsolete: | 0 → 1 |
|---|
comment:6 by , 22 years ago
| attachments.isobsolete: | 0 → 1 |
|---|
comment:7 by , 22 years ago
| Resolution: | → later |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Since it depends on 57, then later. I like the idea.
comment:8 by , 21 years ago
| Milestone: | post-1.0 → 6.0 |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | later |
| Status: | closed → reopened |
5.0 is out, reopen all bugs.
comment:9 by , 21 years ago
| dependson: | 57 |
|---|
Scrap my patch....the ones in conathan's bootscripts are much cleaner. This bug should still be on hold however, we'll need to see if that script falls into the base LFS or not. I would say that it belongs in LFS, simply because it's nfs client capable right out of the box, but if there is argument against it, then it's not a big deal to drop into BLFS (end of chapter 3?). Also, the dependancy on nfs is not a real dependancy....I was originally going to try to lop it on the end of that section, or maybe just before we get to nfs/samba/ncpfs.
comment:10 by , 21 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
Fixed. Put in the latest version from Nathan and my own work.
Priority P5. Depends on 57 and others as they become availible.