Opened 9 years ago

Closed 9 years ago

#5864 closed enhancement (fixed)

x264-snapshot-20150908-2245

Reported by: Fernando de Oliveira Owned by: Fernando de Oliveira
Priority: normal Milestone: 7.8
Component: BOOK Version: SVN
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc:

Description (last modified by Fernando de Oliveira)

Change History (15)

comment:1 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

comment:2 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

comment:3 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

Milestone: 7.7hold
Summary: x264-snapshot-20141208x264-snapshot-20141208 (placeholder)

comment:4 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

Changed to bimonthly.

comment:5 by Armin K, 9 years ago

Latest snapshot is dated 20141218 as it seems. No change since then.

If you are going to update bimonthly, I suggest you use non-stable snapshot. What's the point of updating the stable one regulary anyways, since almost nothing important changes?

http://git.videolan.org/?p=x264.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable

comment:6 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

I am still assuming that they are on vacation. If there is no new release, I agree with you, no point in updating.

Also, assuming that they cme back, what do you think is a good frequency for updating?

comment:7 by Armin K, 9 years ago

You are the one doing the work, so it's up to you.

comment:8 by bdubbs@…, 9 years ago

This ticket is just a reminder due to upstream's policy about releases. If nothing is changed, then no action is needed.

comment:9 by Armin K, 9 years ago

It seems they have fixed their daily generation packages. I propose every new release a new non-stable snapshot is used, given that stable ones rarely change anything.

comment:10 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

Description: modified (diff)
Summary: x264-snapshot-20141208 (placeholder)x264-snapshot-20150717 (placeholder)

Should updates be done bimonthly at the same date, or do you think it should follow mplayer, just before BLFS release?

comment:11 by bdubbs@…, 9 years ago

My preference is just before a BLFS release unless we are aware of an important change. An important change, IMO, is one that would need an entry in the stable errata.

comment:12 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

OK, thanks.

comment:13 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

Milestone: hold7.8
Owner: changed from blfs-book@… to Fernando de Oliveira
Status: newassigned

comment:14 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

Description: modified (diff)
Summary: x264-snapshot-20150717 (placeholder)x264-snapshot-20150908-2245

comment:15 by Fernando de Oliveira, 9 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

Fixed at r16385.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.