Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
#1551 closed defect (fixed)
Section 6.54.2 nitpick
Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | lowest | Milestone: | |
Component: | Book | Version: | TESTING |
Severity: | trivial | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
Noted in the first paragraph of configuring shadow:
"This package contains utilities to add, modify, and delete users and groups; set and change their passwords; and perform other administrative tasks."
It is my belief that this is improper use of semicolons. It is my understanding that semicolons can be used where a period could also be used. The clauses separated by semicolons should be complete sentences.
I suggest changing the semicolons to commas in the listed sentence.
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
I don't know how authoratative it is, but http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_overvw.html says
"In addition to using a semicolon to join related independent clauses in compound sentences, you can use a semicolon to separate items in a series if the elements of the series already include commas."
In this context, I believe the semicolon usage is correct, as we're listing functionality of the programs, and the first item in the list contains commas.
As for comment 1, I agree of course: s/shadow-compliant/Shadow-compliant/
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:4 by , 19 years ago
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
Fixed issue 2 in trunk r6065. Waiting to merge it in testing. Is issue 1 a WONTFIX?
comment:5 by , 19 years ago
Yes, I think so, as Randy hasn't hit me with a grammarian-cluebat yet :) Randy, feel free to re-open if you think it still needs addressing. Manuel, please merge r6065 to testing, then close this one off as 'FIXED', thanks.
comment:6 by , 19 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Fixed issue 2 in testing r6067.
Also noted in the same paragraph:
"must be shadow-compliant"
Because "shadow" is being used as a Package name here, perhaps it should be capitalized?