Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
#1568 closed defect (fixed)
Section 8.3.1 nitpick
Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | lowest | Milestone: | |
Component: | Book | Version: | TESTING |
Severity: | trivial | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
About halfway or so down there is a paragraph:
"LFS bootscripts make the assumption that either both Support for Host-side USB and USB device filesystem have been compiled directly into the kernel, or that neither is compiled at all. Bootscripts will not work properly if it is a module (usbcore.ko)."
- s/LFS bootscripts/LFS Bootscripts/ (assuming it is being used as a proper noun)
- "that either both" is confusing and hard to understand. Removing "either"
makes this sentence much easier to understand.
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
Matt, were you just suggesting text, or were you planning on committing the text?
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
Well, it was really a suggestion that someone could incorporate in my absence over the last weekend. If you're able to commit it that's fine, otherwise I'll get round to it myself.
comment:4 by , 19 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:6 by , 19 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Fixed in testing (r6077). Closing bug.
Suggested text. I changed "it" to "Host-side USB" as it wasn't immediately clear which of the two modules we discuss in the previous sentence causes us problems (it can be inferred from the module name in paranthesis, but I think the suggested wording improves readability).
"LFS Bootscripts make the assumption that both Support for Host-side USB and USB device filesystem have been compiled directly into the kernel, or that neither is compiled at all. The bootscripts will not work properly if "Host-side USB" is compiled as a module (usbcore.ko)."