Opened 23 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
#180 closed defect (wontfix)
suggestion: incorporate LSB test in LFS
Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | lowest | Milestone: | |
Component: | Book | Version: | CVS |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 23 years ago
Resolution: | → later |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 23 years ago
Resolution: | later |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
comment:3 by , 23 years ago
Priority: | normal → lowest |
---|
comment:4 by , 21 years ago
comment:5 by , 21 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
The idea was good at the time, but it's more effort than I am willing to spend on it at this point in time. Agree with proposal and closing.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Why do we want this incorporated into LFS? The idea of an LFS system passing the LSB test suite sounds nice in principle, but it won't achieve anything useful from what I can tell. It is oriented towards binary distros who operate as companies. Additionally, there are a number of problems according to here:
http://www.linuxbase.org/test/lsb-runtime-test-faq.html
Actually getting certified looks to be quite complicated with all sorts of administrivia involved. At this stage, I think the best we can hope for is to make LFS as close as possible to conforming to an "LSB Runtime Environment" so that any "LSB Application" will install and run properly.
Interesting tidbit: Debian is not currently listed in the Certification Register:
http://www.opengroup.org/lsb/cert/cert_prodlist.tpl