Opened 23 years ago

Closed 22 years ago

Last modified 22 years ago

#190 closed defect (fixed)

reorganise descriptions

Reported by: markh@… Owned by: markh@…
Priority: highest Milestone:
Component: Book Version: CVS
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc: gerard@…

Description

the descriptions of the parts of the packages need to be alphabeticalised (spelling?).

Change History (11)

comment:1 by markh@…, 23 years ago

Resolution: later
Status: newclosed

comment:2 by gerard@…, 23 years ago

also check all the descriptions (packages have updated ,new programs added, old ones possibly removed/renamed) and sync them

comment:3 by markh@…, 23 years ago

Resolution: later
Status: closedreopened

comment:4 by markh@…, 23 years ago

everything should be in alphabetical order now in cvs (I hope). we now need to check and sync them.

comment:5 by gerard@…, 22 years ago

Priority: normalhighest

comment:6 by markh@…, 22 years ago

Owner: changed from lfs-book@… to markh@…
Status: reopenedassigned

comment:7 by markh@…, 22 years ago

ok. policy decision needed.

For the descriptions, IMO, we should mention each executable thing which comes which each package. At the moment we don't. This would involve including things list the bashbug and glibc-bug scripts. I'm quite happy (and ready) to add these but I want to check that it's ok with you lot first.

comment:8 by markh@…, 22 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

all descriptions are now up-to-date in the style agreed on lfs-book so the descriptions now list *all* programs and *all* libraries installed by each package (I hope...)

comment:9 by markh@…, 22 years ago

Cc: gerard@… added

* Bug 276 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *

comment:10 by gerard@…, 22 years ago

Keywords: VERIFIED added

comment:11 by gerard@…, 22 years ago

Keywords: VERIFIED removed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.