#203 closed defect (wontfix)
binutils recommends building from seperate directory, ala gcc and glibc style
| Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Book | Version: | CVS |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
(unconfirmed by the way, but I have no reason to doubt this, I'm sure people don't think think this up because they're bored ;o)
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 23 years ago
comment:2 by , 22 years ago
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Sounds good to me too. Closing it.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
it does suggest this but only in a subdir of the binutils packages (the binutils subdir). OTOH, in the / of the package it says that just doing a ./configure && make && make install will work fine. The docs aren't particularly clear and as we haven't had problems I suggest just going with what we know works, i.e. no change.