Opened 17 years ago
Last modified 15 years ago
#2093 closed task
Add a new section for multiple boot loaders — at Version 4
Reported by: | Jeremy Huntwork | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 6.6 |
Component: | Book | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Trunk can as of now build three different architectures (minus the kernel):
- x86
- x86_64 (64-bit only)
- powerpc
There are various alternatives of boot loaders for each architecture. Need to create a new section to show how to build and use various boot loaders and which architectures are supported for each.
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Filesystems aren't the issue (especially now that grub has been patched). The point is that various architectures need various bootloaders. Also note that this ticket isn't specifically for trunk, but for the jh branch, an experimental book.
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Bad news: http://bugs.debian.org/479607 (affects LILO loading big initramfs with linux-2.6.25). According to the Debian maintainer, this bug makes LILO unsuitable for inclusion into Debian. LFS should retest the bug and possibly take this into account.
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Version: | JH → SVN |
Do we need for each possible bootloader to be compatible with every possible filesystem chosen by the user?
I mean... in the book we create an ext3 filesystem, and if we're gonna put some alternative bootloaders to grub, we could mention extlinux, from the syslinux package, supposedly works very well with ext2/3 filesystems (although I haven't tested it yet, but could be doing so)
So are we going to define a series of requisites or pre-requisites for bootloaders to be mentioned or the list can be wide in that sense?
Julio