Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#2258 closed task (fixed)
Document wget-list for LFS book
| Reported by: | Chris Staub | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 7.0 |
| Component: | Website | Version: | SVN |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
A wget-list is now automatically generated when the book is rendered, but this is not mentioned anywhere. It should probably be referenced on the "Download" page and/or the FAQS (one of the "expired" FAQS is in fact "Where are the lfs-packages tarballs or wget scripts?").
Change History (5)
follow-up: 4 comment:2 by , 16 years ago
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Well, I did contribute something useful to LFS, and that was the Perl Debian Fixes patch. So please let me make comments on the LFS Trac.
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
Replying to matthew@linuxfromscratch.org:
lfsrocks/willim Please do not post any further comments until you learn a) what the general etiquette/workflow of tickets/bug reports are and b) how to make a useful contribution to LFS development.
It is up to the editors and/or release manager to target tickets for specific releases, not >those that report the bugs. Any attempt by bug reporters to set milestones and such like may >well be futile. Much like my attempt to actually get you to see reason and provide useful >information on tickets, I guess. I can't believe I've just wasted all these bits on you...oh >well.
Well, you can still decide when this can go into 6.4 or not. I'm just saying, so don't get angry all over me.
comment:5 by , 16 years ago
| Component: | Book → Website |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | → 7.0 |
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
On the web site, added a note to read.html to indicate that there is a wget list available. Also added a faq entry about the same topic.
lfsrocks/willim Please do not post any further comments until you learn a) what the general etiquette/workflow of tickets/bug reports are and b) how to make a useful contribution to LFS development.
It is up to the editors and/or release manager to target tickets for specific releases, not those that report the bugs. Any attempt by bug reporters to set milestones and such like may well be futile. Much like my attempt to actually get you to see reason and provide useful information on tickets, I guess. I can't believe I've just wasted all these bits on you...oh well.