Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
#2399 closed defect (wontfix)
GCC-4.4.0 fails 7 tests unexpectedly
Reported by: | Matthew Burgess | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 6.5 |
Component: | Book | Version: | SVN |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
My test logs show GCC-4.4.0 failing the following tests:
gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntdq-256-1.c (test for excess errors) gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntpd-256-1.c (test for excess errors) gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntps-256-1.c (test for excess errors)
If fails to produce an executable in each case.
It also fails the following 4 mudflap tests:
libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-static) execution test libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test
These may be covered under the current note about libmudflap being particularly problematic, but confirming its due to a timeout as the bug we link to suggests would be good.
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
I've been building manually and got the following for gcc:
=== g++ Summary === # of expected passes 19702 # of expected failures 142 # of unsupported tests 99 /sources/gcc-build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ version 4.4.0 (GCC) === gcc tests === -- === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 56715 # of unexpected failures 3 # of expected failures 188 # of unsupported tests 436 /sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.4.0 (GCC) -- === libgomp Summary === # of expected passes 1007 === libmudflap tests === Running target unix FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test -- === libmudflap Summary === # of expected passes 1890 # of unexpected failures 4 === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix -- === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes 5848 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 80 # of unsupported tests 334 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntdq-256-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntpd-256-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntps-256-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-static) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test
I think this is OK. Compare to: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-05/msg02136.html
However, the time to run make check
is *really* long. Somewhere around 40 SBU on my test system. I recommend closing this ticket, but using alfs logs to update all the SBU times and build sizes.
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Closing, as Bruce's link to upstream test results should be enough for folks not to be too scared by the additional avx* failures. Build logs & SBU times are to be updated by Bruce following his next jhalfs build.
Looks like the avx tests fail due to the version of Binutils we use. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38906. So, I think a note to this effect is pertinent for 6.5.