Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
#2399 closed defect (wontfix)
GCC-4.4.0 fails 7 tests unexpectedly
| Reported by: | Matthew Burgess | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 6.5 |
| Component: | Book | Version: | SVN |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
My test logs show GCC-4.4.0 failing the following tests:
gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntdq-256-1.c (test for excess errors) gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntpd-256-1.c (test for excess errors) gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntps-256-1.c (test for excess errors)
If fails to produce an executable in each case.
It also fails the following 4 mudflap tests:
libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-static) execution test libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test
These may be covered under the current note about libmudflap being particularly problematic, but confirming its due to a timeout as the bug we link to suggests would be good.
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
I've been building manually and got the following for gcc:
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 19702
# of expected failures 142
# of unsupported tests 99
/sources/gcc-build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ version 4.4.0 (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
--
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 56715
# of unexpected failures 3
# of expected failures 188
# of unsupported tests 436
/sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.4.0 (GCC)
--
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes 1007
=== libmudflap tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test
--
=== libmudflap Summary ===
# of expected passes 1890
# of unexpected failures 4
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
--
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 5848
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 80
# of unsupported tests 334
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntdq-256-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntpd-256-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntps-256-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-static) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test
I think this is OK. Compare to: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-05/msg02136.html
However, the time to run make check is *really* long. Somewhere around 40 SBU on my test system. I recommend closing this ticket, but using alfs logs to update all the SBU times and build sizes.
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Closing, as Bruce's link to upstream test results should be enough for folks not to be too scared by the additional avx* failures. Build logs & SBU times are to be updated by Bruce following his next jhalfs build.

Looks like the avx tests fail due to the version of Binutils we use. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38906. So, I think a note to this effect is pertinent for 6.5.