Opened 25 years ago

Closed 21 years ago

#83 closed defect (fixed)

binutils-2.16.1

Reported by: gerard@… Owned by: lfs-book@…
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: Book Version: SVN
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc:

Description

Change History (46)

comment:1 by gerard@…, 25 years ago

dependson: → 30

comment:2 by gerard@…, 25 years ago

Owner: changed from lfs-book@… to gerard@…
Status: new → assigned

comment:3 by gerard@…, 25 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: assigned → closed

Updated book to binutils-2.11.2

comment:4 by gerard@…, 25 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.11.2 → binutils-2.12

comment:5 by gerard@…, 25 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

updated to binutils-2.12

comment:6 by markh@…, 25 years ago

installs ok. closing

comment:7 by gerard@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.12 → binutils-2.12.1

comment:8 by markh@…, 24 years ago

Owner: changed from gerard@… to markh@…
Status: reopened → assigned

comment:9 by markh@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: assigned → closed

updated book to binutils-2.12.1

comment:10 by highos@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.12.1 → binutils-2.13

Version increment.

comment:11 by florian.dittmer@…, 24 years ago

just for your info, in the new release -z combreloc has been enabled by default.

comment:12 by gerard@…, 24 years ago

Priority: normal → highest
Version: 3.0-pre4 → CVS

comment:13 by timothy@…, 24 years ago

Owner: changed from markh@… to timothy@…
Status: reopened → new

comment:14 by timothy@…, 24 years ago

Owner: changed from timothy@… to lfs-book@…

comment:15 by timothy@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: new → closed

comment:16 by highos@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.13 → binutils-2.13.1

Version increment (2.13.1);

​http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-11/msg00238.html

comment:17 by timothy@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

comment:18 by highos@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.13.1 → binutils-2.13.2

Version increment (2.13.2)

comment:19 by timothy@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

comment:20 by highos@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.13.2 → binutils-2.13.2.1

Version increment (2.13.2.1)

comment:21 by gerard@…, 24 years ago

Status: reopened → assigned

comment:22 by timothy@…, 24 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: assigned → closed

comment:23 by highos@…, 23 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.13.2.1 → binutils-2.14

Version increment (2.14)

comment:24 by Matthew Burgess, 23 years ago

This needs make configure-host to be run after the ./configure command and before the current make command in order to prevent the -all-static LDFLAGS from being passed directly to gcc which will cause the error described in the following thread: ​http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs- dev/2003/02/0691.html.

Regards,

Matt.

comment:25 by gerard@…, 23 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

comment:26 by gerard@…, 23 years ago

dependson: 30

comment:27 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.14 → binutils-2.15

Version increment (2.15)

comment:28 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

Fixed in 6.0

comment:29 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

bug_file_loc: → http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/
Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.15 → binutils-2.15.92.0.2

Version increment (2.15.92.0.2) - mainly x86-64 fixes, although PPC and ARM fixes make it in there too.

comment:30 by jim@…, 22 years ago

Updated in testing by Jim

comment:31 by jeremy@…, 22 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

Upgraded in Unstable

comment:32 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

Priority: highest → normal
Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.15.92.0.2 → binutils-2.15.94.0.1
Version: CVS → SVN

Version increment (2.15.94.0.1)

comment:33 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

Here's some updated test results. Notice we don't get any unexpected failures, which are currently mentioned in the book!

binutils Summary

# of expected passes 33

gas Summary

# of expected passes 81

ld Summary

# of expected passes 236 # of expected failures 4

./test-demangle: 746 tests, 0 failures

comment:34 by jeremy@…, 22 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

Upgraded in unstable

comment:35 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.15.94.0.1 → binutils-2.15.94.0.2

Version increment (2.15.94.0.2):

Changes from binutils 2.15.94.0.1:

  1. Update from binutils 2004 1220.
  2. Fix strip for TLS symbol references.

So, this would apparently fix our stripping probs.

comment:36 by jeremy@…, 22 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

Upgraded to 2.15.94.0.2 in both testing and unstable.

comment:37 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.15.94.0.2 → binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2

Version increment (2.15.94.0.2.2) - no, that's not a typo...that is the real version number :( Release notes at ​http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/release.binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2

comment:38 by jim@…, 22 years ago

Updated in multi-arch

comment:39 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

comment:40 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2 → binutils-2.16.90.0.1

Version increment (2.16.90.0.1). The release notes at ​http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/release.binutils-2.16.90.0.1 look like the kernel needs patching in order to work around some backward incompatible changes in this release.

comment:41 by jim@…, 22 years ago

Resolution: → wontfix
Status: reopened → closed

Too many issues with this new version of binutils, will not be updating.

​http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=815 ​http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2005-02/msg00008.html

comment:42 by Matthew Burgess, 22 years ago

Resolution: wontfix
Status: closed → reopened
Summary: binutils-2.16.90.0.1 → binutils-2.16.90.0.2

Version increment (2.16.90.0.2). Is this one any better, by any chance?

comment:43 by Matthew Burgess, 21 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed

Upgraded to binutils-2.16. We'll hold off on further HJL releases until we actually require the features it provides.

comment:44 by jim@…, 21 years ago

Summary: binutils-2.16.90.0.2 → binutils-2.16.1

Version update 2.16.1.

Looks like a lot of architecture specific updates for MIPS, PPC64, ALPHA, and a few for x86.

comment:45 by Matthew Burgess, 21 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closed → reopened

We're still on 2.16 on trunk. Reopening.

comment:46 by Matthew Burgess, 21 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: reopened → closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.