Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
#1576 closed defect (fixed)
/etc/inputrc text a bit long-winded?
| Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | lowest | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Book | Version: | TESTING |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
This page seems overly pedantic. Perhaps assuming /etc/inputrc and just mentioning ~/.inputrc in passing would be more in line with standard assumptions about the user's level of knowledge? Also, the book doesn't create /etc/skel. BLFS has a fine page for that at: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/skel.html
Should we remove reference to /etc/skel?
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 20 years ago
comment:2 by , 20 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|
Okay. I've got the text done. Just waiting on an answer about <application> tags.
comment:4 by , 20 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Fixed in testing (r6146). Closing bug.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
The suggested wording at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2005-June/051888.html looks good to me. As for your FIXMEs:
1) I think it should be "startup"; the hyphenated version appears to be when using the word as a noun, e.g. "business start-up". 2) Your suggested comment improvement looks good.
Thanks!