rc and rcS file may need updating

[gerard@…]

It contains: for i in /etc/rcS.d/S??*

This probably should be changed to /etc/rcS.d/S???* because the symlinks have three digits now. Or what about just siple /etc/rcS.d/S* ? S??* works fine with 2 or more digits, but what if you only want one digit?

The same goes for the rc script. We use S[0-9][0-9][0-9] right now. This forces 3 digits (I haven't tried this with two digits yet,it may work regardless). What if we want more or less digits?

And let's sync these. If rc has S[0-9] constructions, then rcS should have the same type of thing.

What we need: construction that works no matter how many digits your symlinks have.

[nomis80@…]

Bug in rcS fixed, now it enforces 3 digits in symlinks. We decided against making rc and rcS overly complicated, so the symlinks will still be three-digits only. It's not the end of the world.

[gerard@…]

Going to be changed from "for i in S[0-9][0-9][0-9]" to "for i in S*". The rc and rcS scripts will be fixed up later to make them do proper checking etcetera.

[gerard@…]

Changed to S*